The Future of Procurement: 2020: Talent Competition Heats Up

There is consensus that the talent pipeline is too thinly populated to meet the expected demand for strategic sourcing professionals in 2020. The CPO will need to function as a magnet for procurement talent by promoting global talent, utilizing state of the art technologies, training people broadly, and ensuring they are positioned to move up into bigger roles.

The emerging workforce has very different motivators. The younger generation wants the latitude to pursue all of their interests, both professional and personal. Flexible work arrangements, non-traditional compensation models with bigger bonuses and variable compensation tied to individual and team performance will become common. Companies will need to ensure that the procurement staff remains visible in the organization, and that people are developed so that they are promotable.

Adapted from VISION 2020: Ideas for Procurement in 2020 by Industry Leading Procurement Executives http://bit.ly/kIwoW3

KPIs for Responsible Sourcing

Responsible sourcing has reached a crossroad as companies have evolved from an approach based on employee compliance to one that goes beyond this to drive continuous improvement through strong supplier management and partnerships. Companies seek to demonstrate the value of responsible sourcing, but the lack of common standards for evaluating these successes threatens to undermine further development and wider adoption of these responsible sourcing practices.

There are a number of metrics currently in existence that impact the process of goal setting and evaluation:

• Goal setting and the key performance indicators for supply chain sustainability remains a work in progress. Most focus on qualitative program descriptions and challenges, rather than focussing on outcomes or value. A better approach would be to focus on continuous improvement.
• Public reporting is still focussed on negatives such as lack of supplier compliance, while measure so of positive values are underdeveloped. A more sophisticated approach would be to measure both supplier capacity as well as performance. Suppliers need to be able to understand the value created by their meeting responsible sourcing requirements, as this will provide them with the best motivation to comply.
• Supplier scorecards do not capture the data needed to allow internal audiences to make informed sourcing decisions. It's important to build ownership for metrics so that responsibility for implementation can be assigned throughout the company and accountability is clear. Micro-level targets can be established, and rolled up to provide a picture of overall performance,
• IT infrastructure remains a critical barrier to program measurement. Difficulty in accessing information has limited the ability to manipulate and analyze data. Fixing these problems will be expensive.
• Supply chain processes are not sufficiently transparent so that it can be determined that companies are managing their supply chain responsibility at an acceptable level. Companies need to demonstrate that they are meeting these commitments to their investors and other stakeholders, and they need to demonstrate how the value derived from these efforts on social and environmental issues.

Methods for evaluating the success and impact of supply chain sustainability programs must continue to be developed. Deficiencies in creating internal alignment must be addressed, and IT systems must be upgraded and improved. Communication between companies and investors must be developed with greater clarity around responsible sourcing practices and how they impact social and environmental outcomes. Communication and collaboration among stakeholders as well as transparency in the collection and analysis of metrics and indicators needs to be developed.

Adapted from: Key Performance Indicators for Responsible Sourcing, http://bit.ly/cD3EuM